After building the Terminal 2.1 spec, I turned Claude on myself. “Review this spec against best practices - Spec-Driven Development, TDD guidelines, Hermeneutic Circle methodology. How does it hold up?”

The results were humbling. Strong marks for Hub-Spoke Architecture ✅, 600-line rule compliance ✅, and UdonSharp checks ✅. But big gaps: no TDD integration ❌, missing Hermeneutic Circle analysis ❌, incomplete pre-commit workflow ❌.

This is how you get better - critique your own work with the same rigor you’d apply to someone else’s. The spec demonstrates solid architecture thinking, but I’m not validating it with tests or considering WHOLE ↔ PART impacts explicitly. Those are fixable gaps.

Using AI to review your own methodology is meta-learning at its finest.